Sometimes a person's conduct is so reckless that it becomes the basis for a lawsuit or criminal prosecution. If a person acts with such utter disregard for the safety of others -- and knows (or should know) that his actions may cause harm to someone else -- he may be liable for injuries caused by his recklessness.
There are four basic theories of liabilities which, depending on the type of lawsuit, can render a defendant liable for injuries he or she causes.
Recklessness involves conduct that is short of actual intent to cause harm, but greater than simple negligence. Unlike negligence -- which occurs when a person unknowingly takes a risk that they should have been aware of -- recklessness means to knowingly take a risk.
State laws prohibit many reckless behaviors and look upon reckless actors as social dangers because they gamble with other people's safety. A person who has been injured from a civil claim of recklessness of another may recover compensation for any resulting medical expenses, lost wages, rehabilitation, pain, and suffering. In addition, recklessness may also allow recovery from certain people who are typically immune from liability for mere negligence, such as government workers and health care professionals.
What Constitutes Recklessness?
Recklessness is a state of mind that is determined both subjectively and objectively. There are two types of reckless behavior. The first looks at what the actor knew or is believed to have been thinking when the act occurred (subjective test). The second considers what a reasonable person would have thought in the defendant's position (objective test). In both situations, the issue turns on conscious awareness, or whether the person knew (or should have known) his actions may cause harm to another.
For example, it is reckless for a driver of a car to intentionally cross through a highway in defiance of a stop sign if a stream of traffic is seen to be closely approaching in both directions. Contrast that with his failure to stop because his attention is diverted and he does not know that he is approaching the crossing (which would be negligent).
Other examples of behaviors considered risky or reckless include:
Elements of Recklessness
Generally, an actor's conduct is reckless if:
Recklessness differs from negligence - which consists mainly of carelessness or incompetence - in that recklessness requires the conscious choice to take a particular course of action. Also, recklessness requires a further degree of risk on the part of the actor than does negligence.
It's important to note that reckless misconduct differs from intentional wrongdoing on one point. Under recklessness, the actor intends to commit the act but does not actually intend to cause harm to others. Instead, he may wish that the harm does not happen, but he has a strong reason to believe that it might.
Have Specific Questions About Recklessness? Talk to an Attorney
In most states, a person can sue for personal injuries and recover compensation for a range of damages resulting from another's reckless behavior. People can often also recover legal costs incurred in pursuing a recklessness tort claim. If you think you have a potential recklessness claim, you should consult with a skilled personal injury attorney to best protect your rights.